| By Richard
C. Stump II
We live in an age of great scientific
advances. Things considered to be impossible 100 years
ago are as commonplace as a blade of grass. Medical
advances make possible the treatment and detection of disease which would once
have caused death, but with all the changes that have taken place in the world,
there is one thing that is still the same: we still have those individuals who would take
advantage of people’s lack of knowledge and gullibility for their own gain.
We see this is drug trafficking, theft, and even in some businesses.
One
hundred years ago, patent medicine men roamed the countryside selling all kinds
of concoctions that were supposed to cure nearly any ailment.
The claims made were fantastic and the sales pitch excellent; so, naturally,
people bought the concoctions. The medicine
man was careful to tell people that the effect was not immediate so as not to
arouse suspicion while he was still in town. The interesting thing
was many people actually felt better after they took the medicine, some even claimed
it cured their diseases. This kind of medicine today is known as a placebo.
Many doubted the effectiveness but bought it anyway because they thought
it might work, and besides it was so much cheaper than going to the doctor.
Only the patent medicine man knew it was a fake. Government agencies put the patent medicine
men out of business, but the tendency for people to pull the same kind of dishonest
scheme is still there. So we find those
same kind of individuals searching for some kind of product that they can sell
at extreme profit to that gullible section of the population that still exists.
What they need is something slightly mysterious, yet readily available.
What comes to mind immediately is magnets and magnetism.
Couple this with a pseudo-scientific explanation that sounds plausible
and convincing. Then mass produce the
product for $2 and sell it for $200. It
is a known statistical fact that only 40 percent of the people who are sold a
defective or non-functioning product will ever complain and far fewer would ever
demand a refund. So with a profit margin
of thousands of percent, you can still be way ahead of the game. An even more clever maneuver is to make it
your policy that the product cannot be returned for a refund until after you use
it for 90 days. The patent medicine man
used that technique in order to get out of town. Ninety days is just long enough to forget that someone ripped you
off for $200. If simple magnets have such amazine ability so as
to soften and neutralize water and super charge fuel in an engine, why not take
it a step further? Why not magnetic belts
that reduce the size of the fat molecules around your waistline for those of us
who need to trim a few pounds? Or magnetic
shirts that unclog the arteries which surround the heart? Why wouldn’t it remove calcium and cholesterol
deposits from our bodies (70 percent water), if it removes them from our plumbing
in our homes? Perhaps we should come up
with magnetic headbands that supercharge our brains and increase our IQ; or perhaps
magnetic eyeglasses that let you see around corners.
I learned a long time ago, “If it sounds too good to be true, it is.” We
all look for bargains but as the old saying goes, “There are no free rides or
lunches.” Magnetic water treatment isn’t
new. It dates back to the ‘50s, shortly
after real water conditioners were invented. Purdue University studies have shown them to
be totally ineffective in chemically changing the water or reducing scale. Tests on water going in and coming out have
shown them totally ineffective. The only
good thing they do is to get people to think about the quality of water in their
homes. If magnetic
water treatment is so great, why did the Superior Court of Arizona issue a restraining
order banning the sale of magnetic water softeners in 1978?
Why did the Division of Consumer Protection of South Dakota send out a
news release urging residents not to purchase the prevailing magnetic water softeners
at the time? Why did the Minnesota Better
Business News, April 19, 1979, alert consumers to “beware of questionable claims
for magnetic water treatment devices”? Why
did Purdue University state that none of the magnetic water treatment devices
tested shows a beneficial change in the water? Finally, why is it that continued laboratory
tests of such devices show them to be ineffective? Perhaps the
best motto would be, “Let the buyer beware when buying bargain priced parachutes
or water conditioners.” --From the Reading Eagle
|